Most of evangelism
today is obsessed with getting someone to make a decision; the apostles, however, were obsessed with making disciples…Evangelism that focuses on
decisions short circuits and—yes, the word is appropriate—aborts the design of
the gospel, while evangelism that aims at disciples slows down to offer the
full gospel of Jesus and the apostles (p. 18).
I wholeheartedly agree with his observation and
critique.
The “the gospel” we have been sharing is not the
full gospel of Jesus according to the Bible. To use N. T. Wright’s words, “I am
perfectly comfortable with what people normally mean when they say ‘the gospel.’
I just don’t think it is what Paul means. In other words, I am not denying that
the usual meanings are things that people ought to say, to preach about, to
believe. I simply wouldn’t use the word ‘gospel’ to denote those things.”
(Quoted by McKnight, p. 58).
I agree with McKnight that we should define the
gospel by first referring to 1 Corinthians 15.
Now, brothers and
sisters, I want to remind you of the gospel I preached to you, which you
received and on which you have taken your stand. By this gospel you are saved,
if you hold firmly to the word I preached to you. Otherwise, you have believed
in vain (vv. 1-2).
For what I received I
passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins
according to the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third
day according to the Scriptures, and that he appeared to Cephas, and then to
the Twelve (vv. 3-5).
The earliest gospel is concerned about the four
things/events in the life of Jesus Christ: Christ died, Christ was buried,
Christ was raised, and Christ appeared. And the story of Jesus is not
separated from the story of Israel, for the phrase according to the Scriptures indicates that the story of Jesus is
the resolution of the problem of Israel’s story and the fulfillment of the
story of Israel. To share the gospel is to share the story of Jesus as the fulfillment
of the story of Israel.
The word gospel was used in the world of Jews at
the time of the apostles to announce
something, to declare something as good news—the word euangelion always means good news. “To gospel” is to herald, to
proclaim, and to declare something about
something. To put this together, the gospel is to announce good news about key
events in the life of Jesus Christ. To gospel for Paul was to tell, announce,
declare, and shout aloud the Story of Jesus Christ as the saving news of God (pp.
49-50).
One of the problems of the plan of salvation—Jesus dies
on the cross, saves us from our sins, and leads us into heaven—is that it
diminishes the story of Jesus as the apex of God’s saving story from creation,
fall, redemption, and new creation. “Equating the Plan of Salvation with either
the Story of Israel or the Story of Jesus distorts the gospel and at times even
ruins the Story. It is customary in America to refer to the ‘gospel plan of
salvation,’ by which we mean how an
individual gets saved, what God has done for us, and how we are to respond if
we want to get saved” (pp. 37-38). The plan of salvation is not the whole gospel
story. It is only part of the saving story.
In regard with the woman who anointed Jesus with a
jar of costly ointment before the passion of Jesus as a prophetical act for his
burial, Jesus says, “Truly I tell you, wherever the gospel is preached
throughout the world, what she has done will also be told, in memory of her”
(Mark 14:9). Scot McKnight writes:
Why? Because Jesus
assumes the preaching of the gospel will mean telling stories about the life of
Jesus, including this very story of the woman who had just poured oil on him. I
have had Christian students tell me that they know the gospel well but have
never heard this story, and whatever you think of their reading habits, what
this “never-heard-of-it” says is that gospel and four Gospels are not connected
tightly enough. We do know that in the earliest churches the leaders publicly
read from the gospel weekly, something we need to revive once again in our
churches. It was this constant immersion in the Gospel[s] that created the
potential for a gospel culture (p. 91).
Mark 14:9 makes sense in my head the first time in
the context of understanding the Gospel
as the story of Jesus instead of the plan of salvation.
No comments:
Post a Comment