I strongly believe that when a speaker deviates the
attention of the congregation from the Word and focuses on non-essential
matters, it implies that the speaker is incompetent in handling the Word or
doesn’t know how to explain it in details. Reading the Word is not preaching;
showing and explaining a picture is even worse. Reading the Word is called bible
reading before preaching; showing and explaining a picture is called art
exhibition.
In The Living
Church: Convictions of a Lifelong Pastor (Downers Grove: IVP Books, 2007),
John Stott laments over the place of traditional preaching in the contemporary
church:
The contemporary world
is decidedly unfriendly towards preaching. Words have largely been eclipsed by
images, and the book by the screen. So preaching is regarded as an outmoded
form of communication, what someone has called “an echo from an abandoned
past.” Who wants to listen to sermons nowadays? People are drugged by
television, hostile to authority and suspicious of words (p. 97).
A speaker who relies too much on graphics in
preaching may be influenced by the cultural taste of the world. Most graphics
are attractive, but not offensive. The congregation is rarely challenged and
confronted by a beautiful picture. But there is an “attracting offensiveness”[1]
in the Word. “They [the laws of the Lord] are more desirable than gold, even
the finest gold. They are sweeter than honey, even honey dripping from the
comb” (Ps. 19:10, NLT). “For the word of God is full of living power. It is
sharper than the sharpest knife, cutting deep into our innermost thoughts and
desires. It exposes us for what we really are” (Heb. 4:12, NLT).
In Nehemiah 8:8, it says, “They [the Levites] read
from the Book of the law of God and clearly explained the meaning of what was
being read, helping the people understand each passage” (NLT). This is my basic
understanding of preaching: read the Word, explain the Word, and help the
people understand and live the Word.
[1]
This expression is taken
from Darrin Patrick, Church Planting: the Man, the
Message, the Mission
(Wheaton: Crossway, 2010), p. 195.
No comments:
Post a Comment