I am increasingly
realizing that a number of our ministerial students have no ecclesiology to
speak of. For them, the church is a voluntary not-for-profit organization run
like a local franchise. Like other organizations, the mission is to meet the
needs of its target population in order to grow. Ministry means designing
programs that address the widest array of tastes and needs as possible. Its
watchword is hospitality, also known as inclusivity.
These students do not
know what ecclesiology is, and would be suspicious of it if they did, because a
theology of the church threatens the individualism that is the bedrock of this
model, and the voluntarism of our students’ identity. A theological
understanding of the church is prior to the self-concept of the individual and
that runs counter to the highly individualistic notion of selfhood that our
students bring with them. It is not surprising that they resist ecclesiology,
because it seeks to define its members rather than the other way round, now
natural to us [in The Community of the
Word: Toward an Evangelical Ecclesiology, edited by Mark Husbands and
Daniel J. Treier (Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press; Leicester: Apollos, 2005),
p. 201.].
I think her observation is absolutely right.
Theological students are usually concerned about the doctrines of the Word,
God, Christ, Spirit, the end time, etc…When you read a theological textbook,
the study of the church is usually discussed at the end, right before
eschatology. It gives a wrong impression that ecclesiology is less important
than other doctrines. It is true that ecclesiology is usually neglected in
theological studies. The church is just a place where we practice what we know.
The church is a place where a bunch of Christians gather together to do
something in a Christian way. What is the church? What is the nature or essence
of the church? What the church is is
important to what the church does. If
students/pastors do not pay enough attention to what the church is, what the church does will be inevitably done according to human needs or wishes. If
so, the church “seeks to define its members.” The result of that is that the
church is dominated and also captivated by our human-centered wishes of the
church, which no longer reflects the nature and character of God.
Charry’s observation invites Christian leaders to
revisit what the church is. Church
leaders often place the emphasis on serving as servant-leaders. But they often
serve without a strong sense of purpose in terms of leading the church to a
specific direction. I think that servant leadership is a Christ-like attitude
toward ministry. It is a must for all Christians. However, it does not offer us
a clue on what the church is and what
the church does in the light of what
the church is. Church leaders are
called to serve the church as Christ-like servants. Church leaders are also called
to be ecclesial theologians as overseers of the church who help the church know
what the church is and does.
No comments:
Post a Comment